News Summary
A federal appeals court has overturned San Diego’s ban on teaching yoga in public parks, affirming that such classes are protected under the First Amendment. The Ninth Circuit Court’s ruling allows local yoga instructors to resume their free classes, previously disrupted by city regulations. The city had sought permits for fitness activities, but the court found the ban unjustified. This significant ruling highlights the importance of community engagement and the protection of expressive conduct, inviting further legal considerations on public wellness activities.
San Diego – A federal appeals court has ruled that the city of San Diego’s ban on teaching yoga in public parks and beaches is unconstitutional, affirming First Amendment rights. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued this ruling on Wednesday, effectively reversing a prior decision by a lower court and allowing local yoga instructors to resume their classes without interference.
The court’s decision specifically blocks enforcement of municipal ordinances that had prohibited yoga instructors, such as Steven Hubbard and Amy Baack, from conducting their free, donation-based classes at popular locations including Sunset Cliffs and Pacific Beach. The justices found that teaching yoga constitutes a form of protected speech under the First Amendment, categorizing the city’s prohibition as an unconstitutional, content-based restriction.
The legal battle began in early 2024 when San Diego amended its municipal code to require permits for “yoga, fitness classes, and other activities.” However, the city’s regulations explicitly prohibited such permits in certain areas, including Sunset Cliffs, leading to park rangers issuing tickets and dispersing yoga classes—even those offered for free. The court determined that the city failed to offer valid justifications for the ban, noting that the arguments surrounding public safety were not substantiated.
During the court proceedings, the instructors argued that their classes were beneficial to the community and did not impose any fees, distinguishing them from commercial activities. The city’s justification for the ordinance included the desire to control potential commercial activities and maintain the integrity of public spaces. However, the ruling revealed inconsistencies in the city’s application of the ban, particularly when considering that other group activities were allowed to continue unhindered while specific targeting of yoga persisted.
Attorney Bryan Pease, who represented Hubbard and Baack, celebrated the court’s ruling and expressed concern that city officials had unconstitutionally restricted community members’ ability to participate in yoga and wellness activities. The court emphasized that the ordinance was not content-neutral and unfairly categorized yoga alongside commercial services, which impaired instructors’ First Amendment rights.
The court did not address the wider challenges to the city’s ordinance, allowing for the possibility of further legal discussions as the case unfolds. Nevertheless, the unanimous panel of judges ruled that Hubbard and Baack could conduct their yoga classes in public spaces without fear of enforcement actions while the case remains under review.
In light of this ruling, city officials indicated they are evaluating the implications of the decision, considering possible next steps. A spokesperson from the City Attorney’s office acknowledged the need to review the matter in light of the court’s findings. The ruling has drawn attention to the distinction between commercial activities and free community offerings, questioning why the city permits certain events, like fireworks displays hosted by SeaWorld, while restricting public yoga classes.
The Ninth Circuit’s ruling serves as a significant reminder of the importance of protecting expressive conduct associated with teaching and community engagement, reinforcing First Amendment protections. As the situation develops, both the city and the yoga instructors will continue to navigate the legal landscape, highlighting broader implications for public health and community rights in San Diego.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
2025 San Diego County Fair Celebrates Pets and Community
San Diego County Fair to Celebrate Pets and Culinary Creativity
Food and Music Festivals Set to Energize San Diego
Amazon’s Big Spring Sale: A Feast of Discounts for Kitchen Lovers
Additional Resources
- CBS 8 News
- Wikipedia: First Amendment to the United States Constitution
- NBC San Diego
- Encyclopedia Britannica: Constitutional Law
- San Diego Union-Tribune
- Google News: San Diego yoga ban
- Courthouse News
- Google Search: San Diego yoga classes
- Daily Gazette
- Google Scholar: First Amendment
Author: STAFF HERE SAN DIEGO WRITER
SAN DIEGO STAFF WRITER The SAN DIEGO STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HERESanDiego.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in San Diego, San Diego County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as Comic-Con International, San Diego County Fair, and San Diego Pride Festival. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and United Way of San Diego County, plus leading businesses in biotechnology, healthcare, and technology that power the local economy such as Qualcomm, Illumina, and Scripps Health. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREAnaheim.com, HEREBeverlyHills.com, HERECostaMesa.com, HERECoronado.com, HEREHollywood.com, HEREHuntingtonBeach.com, HERELongBeach.com, HERELosAngeles.com, HEREMissionViejo.com, and HERESantaAna.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into California's dynamic landscape.
