Taxpayers Challenge San Diego’s New Trash Fee

Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:
A courtroom scene illustrating the legal challenge against San Diego trash fee.

News Summary

A group of taxpayers in San Diego is legally challenging the city over the constitutionality of its newly approved trash fee. They argue that the fee violates California’s Proposition 218 by exceeding the actual costs of trash collection. With the city facing significant budgetary pressures, the plaintiffs, represented by attorney Mike Aguirre, have requested an expedited hearing to clarify the legality of the fee before collections begin. The situation raises concerns about taxpayer rights and municipal finance as San Diego awaits a court decision.

San Diego, CA – A legal battle is unfolding as a group of taxpayers takes action against the city of San Diego over the constitutionality of its newly approved trash fee. This challenge comes in light of the city planning to begin collections of the fee shortly, linked to concerns surrounding its legality under California law.

On August 7, attorneys representing the taxpayers filed a request with the San Diego Superior Court, asking for an expedited trial before the city starts collecting the trash fee. The legal representation for the challengers includes former City Attorney Mike Aguirre, who claims that the fee violates California’s Proposition 218. This proposition restricts governmental fees to the actual costs incurred for the service provided, meaning the city should only charge residents for the direct expenses associated with trash collection.

Details surrounding the city’s financial situation further complicate matters, as Aguirre noted that San Diego faces a staggering $113 million in pension costs in comparison to a mere $533 million in incoming payments. This budgetary concern has led to accusations that the city is attempting to use the trash fee to shore up its finances rather than simply cover the costs of trash collection.

Aguirre has argued that before the city imposes these fees, the court must clarify their legality, especially given the claims that the city is effectively using them to resolve budgetary issues. In contrast, Deputy City Attorney Gabriel McWhirter opposed the request to expedite the trial process, claiming it would create an unnecessary burden for the city’s defense. McWhirter pointed out that taxpayers already have avenues to challenge the fee and seek refunds if they believe it is unjust.

The city firmly asserts that the fees are constitutional, with McWhirter emphasizing that the absence of published legal opinions from the city attorney does not imply that the trash fees are unlawful. Judge James Mangione intervened and mandated that both Aguirre and the city negotiate a trial date while addressing other pertinent issues regarding the challenge.

A follow-up hearing to set a trial date is slated for August 12. The city’s trash collection fee, recently approved, is set to affect over 200,000 homeowners starting on July 1. Monthly charges will vary from $32.82 to $43.60, raising concerns among property owners who believe they are already contributing to trash collection costs through their property taxes.

The city has also identified approximately 21,000 properties as ineligible for city-managed trash services, prompting property owners to arrange for private trash collection instead. City officials argue that the introduction of the trash fee is crucial to modernizing collection services and alleviating fiscal strains currently faced by San Diego’s General Fund.

As the situation develops, residents of San Diego await the court’s decision, which will determine the future of the trash fee and potentially impact the city’s financial management strategy. Given the upcoming hearing and the ongoing discussions, the outcome could have significant implications for taxpayer rights and municipal finance in San Diego.

Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic

HERE Resources

Community Frustration Grows Over Delays in Sculpture Restoration
San Diego Parks Close Due to Rising Summer Temperatures
San Diego Fire-Rescue Responds to Vehicle Fire on I-15
Grand Jury Report Discovers Mismanagement of Development Impact Fees in San Diego
San Diego Residents Face Challenges with New Waste Collection Portal
San Diego Property Owners Face Trash Service Transition
San Diego City Council Proposes Major Water Rate Increases
San Diego Trash Services Resume After Solidarity Strike
San Diego Introduces New Interactive Trash Bin Selection Website
San Diego Approves $65 Million Trash Bin Replacement Plan

Additional Resources

STAFF HERE SAN DIEGO WRITER
Author: STAFF HERE SAN DIEGO WRITER

SAN DIEGO STAFF WRITER The SAN DIEGO STAFF WRITER represents the experienced team at HERESanDiego.com, your go-to source for actionable local news and information in San Diego, San Diego County, and beyond. Specializing in "news you can use," we cover essential topics like product reviews for personal and business needs, local business directories, politics, real estate trends, neighborhood insights, and state news affecting the area—with deep expertise drawn from years of dedicated reporting and strong community input, including local press releases and business updates. We deliver top reporting on high-value events such as Comic-Con International, San Diego County Fair, and San Diego Pride Festival. Our coverage extends to key organizations like the San Diego Regional Chamber of Commerce and United Way of San Diego County, plus leading businesses in biotechnology, healthcare, and technology that power the local economy such as Qualcomm, Illumina, and Scripps Health. As part of the broader HERE network, including HEREAnaheim.com, HEREBeverlyHills.com, HERECostaMesa.com, HERECoronado.com, HEREHollywood.com, HEREHuntingtonBeach.com, HERELongBeach.com, HERELosAngeles.com, HEREMissionViejo.com, and HERESantaAna.com, we provide comprehensive, credible insights into California's dynamic landscape.

Article Sponsored by:

Want to target the right audience? Sponsor our site and choose your specific industry to connect with a relevant audience.

What Sponsors Receive:
Prominent brand mentions across targeted, industry-focused articles
High-visibility placements that speak directly to an engaged local audience
Guaranteed coverage that maximizes exposure and reinforces your brand presence
Interested in seeing what sponsored content looks like on our platform?
Browse Examples of Sponsored News and Articles:
May’s Roofing & Contracting
Forwal Construction
NSC Clips
Real Internet Sales
Suited
Florida4Golf
Click the button below to sponsor our articles:

Stay Connected

More Updates

Would You Like To Add Your Business?

Sign Up Now and get your local business listed!

WordPress Ads