News Summary
A recent grand jury report has revealed serious mismanagement of over $1 billion in development impact fees in San Diego, highlighting violations of California law. The city failed to adhere to the five-year limit for retaining developer fees, with more than $179 million remaining unallocated for over five years. Transparency issues and improper allocation of funds meant for infrastructure projects raise concerns about the city’s handling of community resources. The report urges the city to refund unallocated fees and implement changes to restore public trust.
San Diego – A grand jury report has unveiled significant mismanagement regarding the city’s handling of more than $1 billion in development impact fees intended for infrastructure projects such as parks, libraries, and fire stations. The investigation, which concluded recently, highlighted a range of violations of California law concerning the collection and utilization of these funds.
The grand jury’s findings indicate that San Diego city officials have systematically exceeded a five-year limit mandated by the state’s Mitigation Fee Act for retaining developer fees. Currently, there are $508 million held in project accounts, with a staggering $179 million of this amount having been stored for over five years without proper justification. The report emphasizes the urgent need for the city to refund these funds.
Transparency issues in the financial management of these developer fees have come to the forefront, with assertions that city officials have neglected to adequately report both the collection and expenditure of these critical funds. Problems identified include repeated delays in submitting annual reports on developer fees and the failure to keep neighborhood project lists updated, which has left many community plans outdated, some exceeding ten years in age.
Effective communication has not only suffered, as city attorney advisements suggesting regular updates to these project plans have been disregarded, but the misuse of developer fees for administrative tasks has also been a major concern. An example cited involves $720,000 spent on managing a fee structure change instead of being allocated toward necessary infrastructure development.
The report contends that the allocation of developer fees has been predominantly directed towards maintaining existing infrastructure, contravening state law that mandates these funds be utilized for creating new public amenities. Warnings regarding such practices have been previously issued to the city, with a confidential memo from former City Auditor Eduardo Luna indicating that these recommendations have been consistently ignored.
As part of their recommendations, the grand jury has urged the city to refund specific amounts of the developer fees that have remained unallocated for extended periods. Legal implications are also on the horizon as developers could potentially pursue legal action to recover unallocated fees, mirroring past experiences in other Californian cities.
The recent grand jury report titled “Never Been Challenged” sheds light on practices that have persisted without confronting legal action or significant pushback from developers or the local community. Concerns about these management issues have resurfaced multiple times, dating back to 2011 and echoed in the latest 2022-2023 grand jury findings.
Within the larger context, over $1 billion in development impact fees have been collected by the city since the Mitigation Fee Act’s inception in 1989. The grand jury has urged that San Diego residents be afforded local amenities supported by these fees, illustrating that deficient management practices detrimentally impact the very residents that city officials are meant to protect.
The City of San Diego is currently preparing a formal response to the grand jury’s findings, which must be submitted by September 30. As the city navigates these revelations, the expectation remains that critical changes are implemented to ensure compliance with state law and to restore public trust in the handling of vital community resources.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
San Diego City Council Approves Paid Parking Around Balboa Park
San Diego Property Owners Face Trash Service Transition
San Diego Trash Services Resume After Solidarity Strike
San Diego Implements Cap on Accessory Dwelling Units
San Diego City Council Acts on Middle Management Cuts Amid Budget Crisis
San Diego Approves $65 Million Trash Bin Replacement Plan
San Diego Property Owners File Lawsuit Against New Trash Fees
San Diego City Council Implements New Trash Collection Fees
San Diego Introduces Credit Card Fees for Parking Meters
San Diego Humane Society Maintains Animal Control Services
Additional Resources
- San Diego Union-Tribune: Watchdog Panel on Developer Impact Fees
- Fox 5 San Diego: Unspent Fees Owed to Property Owners
- San Diego Union-Tribune: Lease for Low-Income Housing
- Encyclopedia Britannica: San Diego
- NBC San Diego: City Auditor on Missed Trash Fees
