News Summary
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has ruled that San Diego’s ban on yoga instruction in public parks and beaches violates First Amendment rights. This ruling allows yoga instructors to resume free donation-based yoga classes in locations like Sunset Cliffs and Pacific Beach, overturning a previous ban. The court found insufficient justification for the city’s ordinance that targeted yoga while permitting other group activities. This decision may lead to further legal discussions regarding the use of public spaces and the regulations affecting yoga classes.
San Diego – A significant legal ruling was issued on Wednesday by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, determining that San Diego’s ban on yoga instruction in public parks and beaches is unconstitutional. The court concluded that offering yoga classes falls under First Amendment rights, categorizing it as a form of expressive speech that deserves protection.
The appeals court’s ruling has direct implications, allowing yoga instructors Steven Hubbard and Amy Baack to resume their free, donation-based yoga sessions in sought-after locations such as Sunset Cliffs and Pacific Beach. This ruling overturns a prior decision from a lower court, which upheld the city’s prohibition on conducting yoga classes without a permit.
In issuing the ruling, the court found that city officials could not adequately demonstrate any legitimate connection between yoga classes and alleged threats to public safety or detriment to the enjoyment of shoreline parks. The ordinance, which sought to regulate various commercial activities, specifically targeted yoga while allowing other group activities like tai chi and theater readings to continue without restrictions.
This ruling brings to light the controversial ordinance, which was amended in early 2024 as part of broader efforts to control the use of public spaces. The city framed the ban as necessary for managing commercial activities in parks, arguing that it aimed to protect these shared areas. However, the court determined that the city failed to present compelling reasons for their stance against yoga instruction, labeling it a content-based restriction on free speech.
As a result of the ruling, a preliminary injunction against enforcing the city’s ordinance has been mandated while the case progresses through the courts, potentially paving the way for further legal discussions about the broader implications of the ordinance against yoga classes.
Attorney Bryan Pease, who represents the yoga instructors, expressed criticism of the city’s approach to managing public spaces. He indicated that the city has misallocated resources to inhibit activities that foster community well-being instead of enhancing the collective quality of life.
Public sentiment appears to have swung against the increasing commercial exploitation of parks, which could have contributed to the city’s decision to crack down on various activities, including yoga. This ruling may provoke further legal debates regarding the scope and enforcement of the ordinance.
After facing numerous citations—despite shifting some of their classes online—Hubbard expressed a sense of vindication following the appeals court’s decision. Both he and Baack have been actively contesting the city’s classification of their activities as commercial services. Their advocacy underscores a growing desire among instructors to preserve their rights to teach yoga within public spaces.
This legal dispute began when the city updated its municipal code with new regulations and has persisted with separate lawsuits initiated by the yoga instructors concerning their ability to conduct classes in public settings.
The city attorney’s office is currently evaluating the implications of the court’s ruling and considering potential next steps in the ongoing legal journey. With the 9th Circuit’s decision reaffirming the First Amendment protections for yoga instruction, it remains to be seen how San Diego will adapt its regulatory approach to accommodate this expressive activity while addressing the broader public interests at stake.
Deeper Dive: News & Info About This Topic
HERE Resources
San Diego’s Music Scene: Resilience and Revival
California Coastal Commission Opposes Mayor’s Budget Cuts
San Diego Weekend Events and Festivals
Ninth Circuit Blocks San Diego’s Ban on Donation-Based Yoga
Weekend Events in San Diego
Federal Court Rules San Diego Yoga Ban Unconstitutional
2025 San Diego County Fair Celebrates Pets and Community
San Diego County Fair to Celebrate Pets and Culinary Creativity
Food and Music Festivals Set to Energize San Diego
Amazon’s Big Spring Sale: A Feast of Discounts for Kitchen Lovers
Additional Resources
- NBC San Diego
- CBS 8
- Courthouse News
- San Diego Union-Tribune
- The Guardian
- Wikipedia: First Amendment to the United States Constitution
- Google Search: San Diego yoga ban
- Google Scholar: San Diego yoga ban court decision
- Encyclopedia Britannica: First Amendment
- Google News: San Diego yoga classes
